Top
WireGuard VPN review: Fast connections amaze, but Windows support needs to happen – ANITH
fade
212547
post-template-default,single,single-post,postid-212547,single-format-standard,eltd-core-1.1.1,flow child-child-ver-1.0.0,flow-ver-1.3.6,eltd-smooth-scroll,eltd-smooth-page-transitions,ajax,eltd-blog-installed,page-template-blog-standard,eltd-header-standard,eltd-fixed-on-scroll,eltd-default-mobile-header,eltd-sticky-up-mobile-header,eltd-dropdown-default,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-5.0.1,vc_responsive

WireGuard VPN review: Fast connections amaze, but Windows support needs to happen

WireGuard VPN review: Fast connections amaze, but Windows support needs to happen

Enlarge / The WireGuard interface, with a Firefox window open to netdata. (credit: Jim Salter)

WireGuard is a new type of VPN which aims to be simpler to set up and maintain than current VPNs and to offer a higher degree of security. The software is free and open source—it’s licensed GPLv2, the same license as the Linux kernel—which is always a big plus in my book. It’s also designed to be easily portable between operating systems. All of that might lead you to ask: in a world that already has IPSEC, PPTP, L2TP, OpenVPN, and a bewildering array of proprietary SSL VPNs, do we need yet another type of VPN?

OK, but why?

I’ve seen a few new VPN designs pop up in the last few years—ZeroTier and Tinc come to mind—and each time, I’ve thought, “I should really look into that.” And then I haven’t. I use OpenVPN heavily; I’m thoroughly familiar with it, and it scratches most of my VPN-related itches pretty well.

So how did WireGuard rattle my cage hard enough to get me to actually play with it? It had something you almost never see: a positive comment about its code from none other than Linus Torvalds.

Read 24 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Source link

Anith Gopal
No Comments

Post a Comment

10 − four =

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.